2.5 Food Saftey Essay Example for Free

2.5 Food Saftey Essay Directions: Complete the food safety interactive quiz. Use the information from the interactive quiz to complete the following responses regarding food safety practices. For each of the following food safety practices, share at least 2 statements from the interactive quiz. Be sure to put these statements in your own words and explain why they are helpful in preventing food borne illness. An example would be: When dining from a buffet, make sure hot food is hot and cold food is cold. Food that is 40 – 140 degrees Fahrenheit has already begun to grow bacteria and pathogens. Clean (16 points): 1. Keeping your surfaces clean after cooking or letting an animal sit on it. 2. Keeping your hands clean keep you from getting ill. Separate (16 points): 1. When cross contamination happens it spreads bacteria from one item to a food item which will make you sick. 2. Keep raw meat and their juices away from cooked or ready-to-eat foods and fresh produce. Cook (16 points): 1. If food is left out for 8 hours, the food should be thrown out. See more: Strategic Management Process Essay When bacteria have nutrients, moisture, and favorable temperatures, they grow rapidly, increasing in numbers to the point where some types of bacteria can cause severe illness Cook thawed food to a minimum internal temperature to kill the bacteria. Chill (16 points): 1. When cooked food is left out for too long it can grow bacteria that can make you sick. 2. Freezing to 0 degrees F inactivates any bacteria, yeasts, and molds present in food. In your own kitchen, explain 2 food safety practices you feel your family can improve and 2 food safety practices you feel your family does well. (16 points) In my house our kitchen counters are perpetually dirty; at least that’s how I feel about it. Every time I walk into the kitchen there dirty and it’s kind of hard to tell who did what cause were a large family. There’s also the problem with closing bags that hold our food after they grab some of the food. For example the for the cheese container, when they make their sandwiches the leave the cheese container open in the refrigerator causing the cheese to go bad at a faster rate. I do have to say when it comes to cleaning dishes we are immaculate. No spot is left on or glass wear and sliver wear. We also are very particular when it comes to cleaning the stove (gas burner), flat top, and indoor grill. In what ways do your school and community practice or promote food safety to contribute to your personal health? (20 points) I can’t really say there’s anything. Our school promotes healthy eating but, I don’t eat school lunch. My community is really into recycling and making sure our streets and beaches our clean if that counts but that’s pretty much it.

The Pros and Cons of Genetic Engineering Essay -- Genetic Engineering E

  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Genetic engineering is a process in which scientists transfer genes from one species to another totally unrelated species. Usually this is done in order to get one organism to produce proteins, which it would not naturally produce. The genes taken from one species, which code for a particular protein, are put into cells of another species, using a vector. This can result in the cells producing the desired protein. It is used for producing proteins which can be used by humans, such as insulin for diabetics and is also used to make organisms better at surviving, for example genetically modifying a plant so that it can survive in acidic soil.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  There is debate about whether genetic engineering should be used or not, and to what degree. There are many problems that can occur from the process and many of these cannot be avoided currently. There are known problems and there is also the fact that the whole process is unpredictable and unforeseen problems could crop up. A good example of this was the influence of a genetically engineered organism on a food chain, which sometimes damaged the local ecology. The new organism could now compete successfully against other species, causing unforeseen changes in the environment. This could then have a knock-on effect that could lead to the destruction of whole species.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Due to the quite random nature of genetic engineering, there is a risk that it may disrupt the functioning of other genes in an organism. This could mean that the organisms do not survive at all, or become some sort of mutated freak, which is completely different and maybe even more dangerous. Genetic engineers also intend to profit by patenting genetically engineered seeds. This means that, when a farmer plants these genetically engineered seeds, all the seeds have an identical genetic structure. As a result, if a fungus, a virus, or a pest develops which can attack this particular crop, they might all be at risk, resulting in widespread crop failure. Insects, birds, and the wind can carry genetically altered seeds, which can cross-pollinate with genetically natural crops and wild relatives. All crops, organic and non-organic, are vulnerable to contamination from cross-pollinatation, meaning that problems in the original genetically modified organisms can be spre ad a... ...age because it means that insulin, which keeps diabetics alive, can be produced quickly and cheaply. Genetic Engineering could also increase genetic diversity, and produce more variants of the same species that could also be crossed over and implanted into other species. Animals and plants can be 'tailor made' to show desirable characteristics. Genes could also be manipulated in trees for example, to absorb more CO2 and reduce the threat of global warming. This would actually help the environment. However many of these things have not been tested and are much more difficult in practice than in theory. That added to the massive uncertainty about the effects and results of genetic engineering would suggest that the benefits do not outweigh the risks taken to obtain them. A religious question also arises. By changing the cells of living organisms are we ‘playing God’ and if we are should we be allowed to?   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  In conclusion I would say that genetic engineering is certainly a good thing saving lives in many cases. However more tests need to be carried out, and profit-hungry companies should not be allowed to do whatever they want in their quests for profit.

The Context Of Behaviour Issues Education Essay

To analyze the manner pupils are larning, I have chosen to research the Blooms Taxonomy theory completed in 1956 by Benjamin Bloom, an educational psychologist. This taxonomy classifies rational operations mobilized during acquisition, the easiest ( underside of the pyramid ) to the complex ( top of the pyramid ) . Here is below an illustration of that pyramid: hypertext transfer protocol: //www.learnnc.org/lp/media/misc/2008/blooms_old.png The 6 degrees of Bloom ‘s pyramid allow the instructor to better form the patterned advance of his class, but besides help to explicate specific larning aims. In 1991, Lorin Anderson a former pupil of Bloom, has significantly changed the degrees of the pyramid maestro with the coaction of David R. Krathwohl, co-author of the original taxonomy ( Anderson & A ; Krathwohl, 2001 ) .A speedy penetration of the theory†¦The involvement of the work of Bloom is that it offers a series of verbs that describe the rational behaviour of each degree of the pyramid. These verbs refer to discernible and let such instructors to compose to specific larning aims. Despite the forsaking of course of study based on specific aims, Bloom ‘s taxonomy is utile. On the one manus, Bloom recognized the complementarity of affectional and psychomotor spheres, although the descriptions he has made aˆâ€ ¹aˆâ€ ¹today seem so superficial. But more significantly, his categorization of the cognitive sphere into six degrees of complexness is a simple manner to stand for the activities of idea for pupils. It combines really good the relationship between cognition ( memory, comprehension, application ) and accomplishments ( application, analysis, synthesis, rating ) . Higher degrees of Bloom ‘s categorization correspond exactly to the creativeness that instruction reform is to develop and redemption which is the best for the hereafter of pupils. In this respect, there are a figure of intriguing schemes and techniques to further creativeness. Bloom ‘s Taxonomy is for me an assistance to explicate inquiries that can find the degree of pupil apprehension. For illustration, a inquiry may be used to find a pupil is adept in factual cognition, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and rating. In my position, instructors are better able to cognize the failings and strengths of their pupils, which help advance larning patterned advance to higher degrees.Some critiquesaTop of Form Since its preparation in 1956, critics of Bloom ‘s taxonomy have by and large focused non on the being of six classs, but the world of a consecutive hierarchal relationship between them. Some consider the three lowest degrees ( cognition, comprehension, and application ) as hierarchically ordered, but the upper three degrees ( analysis, synthesis and rating ) as equal. Others suggest it is sometimes more appropriate to get down the application, before the debut of new constructs. How do I use Bloom ‘s Taxonomy? I would personally state that for the classs that I presently teach I consider chiefly four degrees of acquisition and command of cognition, which correspond approximately to the first four degrees of Bloom ‘s taxonomy: 1. Information degree ( Knowledge ) : cognition is comparative to the apprehensiveness of an overview of a topic: the worlds are shown in some facets in partial or entire. 2. Expression degree ( Comprehension ) : cognition is related to the acquisition of the agencies of look and communicating: define, use the footings component subject. These control cognition. 3. Mastering tools Level ( Application ) : cognition is related to the control of procedures and tools for survey or action: usage, manipulate regulations or sets of regulations ( algorithms ) rules, in order to a consequence to be achieved. It is to get the hang a accomplishment. 4. Master methodological cognition degree ( Analysis ) , which is comparative to the control a methodological analysis of installing and troubleshooting: assemble, organize points in a subject, place relationships, concluding from these relationships, and make up one's mind towards a end. It is an attack to command initiation, tax write-off, proving, certification. Each degree includes the old 1s and with the experience that I am presently constructing as a instructor, synthesis and rating are non truly expected from pupils chiefly because of their bing degree of cognition and the class degree. As good, there is no rigorous order to see in utilizing these different degrees as pupils can be asked to get down a subject at the mastering tools degree, merely to look into their old cognition and construct the lesson harmonizing to the findings. The good facet of Bloom ‘s Taxonomy is that there are sequences in the acquisition procedure that we can play with. So, in footings of learning schemes, depending on the topic, I can get down or present the subject at any degree of Bloom ‘s pyramid. If I teach basic accounting rules to finish novices, I would be given to get down with Bloom ‘s Comprehension degree ( expression degree for me ) , where I try to demo the scholars that they already know some facets of the theory: Lashkar-e-Taiba ‘s state that I intend to learn the double-entry clerking rule. The first measure will be to hold the pupils set in braces and make up one's mind themselves which type of dealing they want to finish. From at that place, they will hold to calculate out the journey of the money which will be different depending on the side where the dealing will hold to be recorded. By pulling a simple map on an activity sheet or the board, they will understand easy how the completed dealing must be recorded. Merely after that measure, will I present the theoretical accounting facet to put the regulation ( Bloo m ‘s Knowledge phase ) . Then the â€Å" usage and manipulate † phase ( Bloom ‘s Application phase ) where pupils will hold tools in manus to work out practical exercisings is introduced. In footings of resources and planning, I use what Rogers ( 2002 ) explained sing a theoretical account of patterned advance in larning associating to different results of acquisition: it implies motor accomplishments which require pattern, verbal information ( facts, rules and generalization ) ; for illustration in concern topics, lesson programs are built in a â€Å" learner-centred manner † : scholars are given the chance to recognize existent and bing concern entities and have to delve deep down in their bing cognition to demo what they already know about the concern environment and rules. They are provided bit by bit throughout the class with the necessary resources: ne'er all of them at one time. Then rational accomplishments come in when scholars have to utilize cognition to know apart, understand theories, constructs and regulations. Straight after that, cognitive schemes help scholars to â€Å" retrieve † , â€Å" think † and â€Å" manage † their freshly acquired accomplishments to specify and work out jobs, which are most of the clip in concern or direction classs instance surveies to be analysed ( Application and analysis phases in Bloom ‘s Taxonomy ) . Top of Form In footings of appraisal and from experiences carried out in category, I can state that each phase of Bloom ‘s pyramid gives chance for appraisal. I have the clear feeling that class bundles provided by most awarding organic structures, when looking at larning results and appraisal standards, are utilizing Bloom ‘s rules particularly when utilizing specific verbs ( describe, buttocks, discuss, explicate aˆÂ ¦ ) to bespeak what scholars need to â€Å" be able to † make in order to demo that they have achieved or understood the topic. Indeed, in the Double-entry clerking topic, I assess bing cognition foremost, and so I follow Bloom ‘s following degrees of larning to do certain pupils are get the hanging specific practical cognition like computations or hard currency flow prognosiss to give an illustration. To come back purely to Bloom ( 1956 ) , a larning nonsubjective describes a general accomplishment or set of accomplishments that the pupil must get at the terminal of a learning sequence. However, the general educational aims can non give rise to a strict rating unless they are made concrete. This requires that they be translated into operational aims. This is cardinal for the advancement and accomplishment of scholars. A end can be considered operational if the followers are specified: – Performance to be achieved ( result ) identifiable by discernible behaviour ( described by action verbs ) and quantifiable or apt to measure up, the scholar can make and he can be evaluated. – The conditions ( context ) in which the behaviour must happen ( limitations, mandates, what equipment to utilize, how long, etc. ) . – Performance standard ( pass grade ) on whether the end is reached ( Level of demand which acquisition is required to turn up and standards used in the rating of larning ) . Inspired by behaviourist, this manner of seeing things has provoked reactions, expostulations, unfavorable judgment sometimes really strong, particularly among advocates of constructivist epistemology towards Bloom ‘s Taxonomy. Nevertheless, the impression of end is cardinal in any methodological attack to the instruction and appraisal. The procedure of rating is hence to put ends ( mentioning to a taxonomy ) to operationalize and specify appropriate agencies ( instruments ) which will find whether aims are achieved by the pupils or non. It will so continue to an analysis of the consequences ( formative rating ) , which will take to a determination which shall be communicated to different stakeholders ( the clip of the communicating ) . However it is non ever didactically clear: how to put ends easy? What preparations to utilize? Should I needfully integrate action verbs? How to verify that the aims are efficaciously operational? From my point of position, the good intelligence is that there are two great and simple tools that, when combined, can assist me accomplish this: the association of Bloom ‘s taxonomy and the SMART method.Top of Form Once the demands and outlooks of a course of study are analysed, specifying the educational ends is a cardinal measure in developing a preparation program. This measure non merely allows me to tag my path ( strategy of work & A ; lesson programs ) , and besides to ease the appraisal. When explicating educational ends, I ask myself the undermentioned inquiry: â€Å" At the terminal of the training/module/course, I would wish my pupils to be able toaˆÂ ¦ ? † . And, depending on the type of accomplishment I want to develop in my pupils, I keep my preparation utilizing a verb of action. At this point, I choose to brainstorm without inquiring myself excessively many inquiries and I try to give free rein to my spontaneousness! The rule of this taxonomy is that scholars must make a specific degree and must be capable of executing the operations matching to ( x ) degree ( s ) . These degrees are therefore hierarchically ordered in cognitive procedures and to supply a model for puting ends for themselves. The accent is non on the course of study content but on how scholars can turn to and get the better of barriers to achievement ( Knowles, 1984 ) . This taxonomy besides allows the designation of the nature of the abilities sought by the aim of preparation and grade of complexness. Identifying the type of larning nonsubjective covered by a resource can see its practical integrating in a pedagogical sequence. An of import point is separating undertaking and end: the indispensable in the educational activity is ne'er the † merchandise â€Å" , the consequence straight discernible ( the papers prepared entirely or in groups, prep, classs and trial tonss ) , even if that is the lone manner to judge pupils ‘ abilities. The of import thing is the advancement made towards each larning result, if it is appropriate and can be reinvested, how it is put into drama and how it allowed scholars to turn. The relationship between the undertaking and the end differentiates developing state of affairs and location of production: in preparation, the end is first in production, it is the undertaking.

All About the Rise and Fall of the Berlin Wall

Erected in the dead of night on August 13, 1961, the Berlin Wall (known as Berliner Mauer in German) was a physical division between West Berlin and East Germany. Its purpose was to keep disaffected East Germans from fleeing to the West. When the Berlin Wall fell on November 9, 1989, its destruction was nearly as instantaneous as its creation. For 28 years, the Berlin Wall had been a symbol of the Cold War and the Iron Curtain between Soviet-led Communism and the democracies of the West. When it fell, the event was celebrated around the world. A Divided Germany and Berlin At the end of World War II, the Allied powers divided conquered Germany into four zones. As agreed at the  July 1945 Potsdam Conference, each was occupied by either the United States, Great Britain, France, or the Soviet Union. The same was done in Germanys capital city, Berlin.   The relationship between the Soviet Union and the other three Allied powers quickly disintegrated. As a result, the cooperative atmosphere of the occupation of Germany turned competitive and aggressive. One of the best-known incidents was the Berlin Blockade in June of 1948  during which the Soviet Union stopped all supplies from reaching West Berlin. Although an eventual reunification of Germany had been intended, the new relationship between the Allied powers turned Germany into West versus East and democracy versus Communism. In 1949, this new organization of Germany became official when the three zones occupied by the United States, Great Britain, and France combined to form West Germany (the Federal Republic of Germany, or FRG). The zone occupied by the Soviet Union quickly followed by forming East Germany (the German Democratic Republic, or GDR). This same division into West and East occurred in Berlin.  Since the city of Berlin had been situated entirely within the Soviet Zone of Occupation, West Berlin became an island of democracy within Communist East Germany. The Economic Differences Within a short period of time after the war, living conditions in West Germany and East Germany became distinctly different. With the help and support of its occupying powers, West Germany set up a capitalist society. The economy experienced such a rapid growth that it became known as the economic miracle. With hard work, individuals living in West Germany were able to live well, buy gadgets and appliances, and travel as they wished. Nearly the opposite was true in East Germany. The Soviet Union had viewed their zone as a spoil of war. They pilfered factory equipment and other valuable assets from their zone and shipped them back to the Soviet Union. When East Germany became its own country in 1949, it was under the direct influence of the Soviet Union and a Communist society was established. The economy of East Germany dragged and individual freedoms were severely restricted. Mass Emigration  From the East Outside of Berlin, East Germany had been fortified in 1952. By the late 1950s, many people living in East Germany wanted out. No longer able to stand the repressive living conditions, they decided to head to West Berlin. Although some of them would be stopped on their way, hundreds of thousands made it across the border. Once across, these refugees were housed in warehouses and then flown to West Germany. Many of those who escaped were young, trained professionals. By the early 1960s, East Germany was rapidly losing both its labor force and its population. Scholars estimate that between 1949 and 1961, nearly 2.7 million people fled East Germany. The government was desperate to stop this mass exodus, and the obvious leak was the easy access East Germans had to West Berlin. What to Do About West Berlin With the support of the Soviet Union, there had been several attempts to simply take over the city of West Berlin. Although the Soviet Union even threatened the United States with the use of nuclear weapons over this issue, the United States and other Western countries were committed to defending West Berlin. Desperate to keep its citizens, East Germany knew that something needed to be done. Famously, two months before the Berlin Wall appeared, Walter Ulbricht, Head of the State Council of the GDR (1960–1973) said, Niemand hat die Absicht, eine Mauer zu errichten. These iconic words mean, No one intends to build a wall. After this statement, the exodus of East Germans only increased. Over those next two months of 1961, nearly 20,000 people fled to the West. The Berlin Wall Goes Up Rumors had spread that something might happen to tighten the border of East and West Berlin. No one was expecting the speed—nor the absoluteness—of the Berlin Wall. Just after midnight on the night of August 12–13, 1961, trucks with soldiers and construction workers rumbled through East Berlin. While most Berliners were sleeping, these crews began tearing up streets that entered into West Berlin. They dug holes to put up concrete posts and strung barbed wire all across the border between East and West Berlin. Telephone wires between East and West Berlin were also cut and railroad lines were blocked. Soldiers closing off East Berlin with barbed wire fences. Keystone / Getty Images Berliners were shocked when they woke up that morning. What had once been a very fluid border was now rigid. No longer could East Berliners cross the border for operas, plays, soccer games, or any other activity. No longer could the approximately 60,000 commuters head to West Berlin for well-paying jobs. No longer could families, friends, and lovers cross the border to meet their loved ones.   Whichever side of the border one went to sleep on during the night of August 12, they were stuck on that side for decades. The Size and Scope of the Berlin Wall The total length of the Berlin Wall was 91 miles (155 kilometers). It cut not only through the center of Berlin, but also wrapped around West Berlin, entirely cutting it off from the rest of East Germany. The wall itself went through four major transformations during its 28-year history. It started out as a barbed-wire fence with concrete posts. Just days later, on August 15, it was quickly replaced with a sturdier, more permanent structure. This one was made out of concrete blocks and topped with barbed wire. The first two versions of the wall were replaced by the third version in 1965, consisting of a concrete wall supported by steel girders. The fourth version of the Berlin Wall, constructed from 1975 to 1980, was the most complicated and thorough. It consisted of concrete slabs reaching nearly 12-feet high (3.6 meters) and 4-ft wide (1.2 m). It also had a smooth pipe running across the top to hinder people from scaling it. Bettmann Archive / Getty Images By the time the Berlin Wall fell in 1989, there was a 300-foot No Mans Land established on the exterior, and  an additional inner wall. Soldiers patrolled with dogs and a raked ground revealed any footprints. The East Germans also installed anti-vehicle trenches, electric fences, massive light systems, 302 watchtowers, 20 bunkers, and even minefields. Over the years, propaganda from the East German government would say that the people of East Germany welcomed the Wall. In reality, the oppression they suffered and the potential consequences they faced kept many from speaking out to the contrary. The Checkpoints of the Wall Although most of the border between East and West consisted of layers of preventative measures, there were little more than a handful of official openings along the Berlin Wall. These checkpoints were for the infrequent use of officials and others with special permission to cross the border. Checkpoint Charlie. Express / Getty Images The most famous of these was Checkpoint Charlie, located on the border between East and West Berlin at Friedrichstrasse. Checkpoint Charlie was the main access point for Allied personnel and Westerners to cross the border. Soon after the Berlin Wall was built, Checkpoint Charlie became an icon of the Cold War, one that has frequently been featured in movies and books set during this time period. Escape Attempts and the Death Line The Berlin Wall did prevent the majority of East Germans from emigrating to the West, but it did not deter everyone. During the history of the Berlin Wall, it is estimated that about 5,000 people made it safely across. Soldiers investigating a tunnel dug beneath the Berlin wall. Michael Ochs Archives / Getty Images Some early successful attempts were simple, like throwing a rope over the Berlin Wall and climbing up. Others were brash, like ramming a truck or bus into the Berlin Wall and making a run for it. Still others were suicidal as some people jumped from the upper-story windows of apartment buildings that bordered the Berlin Wall.   Soldiers patrolling the Death Strip. KEENPRESS / Getty Images In September 1961, the windows of these buildings were boarded up and the sewers connecting East and West were shut off. Other buildings were torn down to clear space for what would become known as the Todeslinie, the Death Line or Death Strip. This open area allowed a direct line of fire so East German soldiers could carry out  Shiessbefehl, a 1960 order that they were to shoot anyone trying escape. Twenty-nine people were killed within the first year. As the Berlin Wall became stronger and larger, escape attempts became more elaborately planned. Some people dug tunnels from the basements of buildings in East Berlin, under the Berlin Wall, and into West Berlin. Another group saved scraps of cloth and built a hot air balloon and flew over the Wall. Unfortunately, not all escape attempts were successful. Since the East German guards were allowed to shoot anyone nearing the eastern side without warning, there was always a chance of death in any and all escape plots. It is estimated that somewhere between 192 and 239 people died at the Berlin Wall. The 50th Victim of the Berlin Wall One of the most infamous cases of a failed attempt occurred on August 17, 1962. In the early afternoon, two 18-year-old men ran toward the Wall with the intention of scaling it. The first of the young men to reach it was successful. The second one, Peter Fechter, was not. West Berliners Protesting at Berlin Wall with pictures of Peter Fechters body. Corbis / Getty Images As he was about to scale the Wall, a border guard opened fire. Fechter continued to climb but ran out of energy just as he reached the top. He then tumbled back onto the East German side. To the shock of the world, Fechter was just left there. The East German guards did not shoot him again nor did they go to his aid. Fechter shouted in agony for nearly an hour. Once he had bled to death, East German guards carried off his body. He became the 50th person to die at the Berlin Wall and a permanent symbol of the struggle for freedom. Communism Is Dismantled The fall of the Berlin Wall happened nearly as suddenly as its rise. There had been signs that the Communist bloc was weakening, but the East German Communist leaders insisted that East Germany just needed a moderate change rather than a drastic revolution. East German citizens did not agree. Russian leader Mikhail Gorbachev (1985–1991) was attempting to save his country and decided to break off from many of its satellites. As Communism began to falter in Poland, Hungary, and Czechoslovakia in 1988 and 1989, new exodus points were opened to East Germans who wanted to flee to the West.   In East Germany, protests against the government were countered by threats of violence from its leader, Erich Honecker (served 1971–1989). In October 1989, Honecker was forced to resign after losing support from Gorbachev. He was replaced by Egon Krenz who decided that violence was not going to solve the countrys problems. Krenz also loosened travel restrictions from East Germany. The Fall of the Berlin Wall Suddenly, on the evening of November 9, 1989, East German government official Gà ¼nter Schabowski blundered by stating in an announcement, Permanent relocations can be done through all border checkpoints between the GDR [East Germany] into the FRG [West Germany] or West Berlin. People were in shock. Were the borders really open? East Germans tentatively approached the border and indeed found that the border guards were letting people cross. Corbis  / Getty Images Very quickly, the Berlin Wall was inundated with people from both sides. Some began chipping at the Berlin Wall with hammers and chisels. There was an impromptu and massive celebration along the Berlin Wall, with people hugging, kissing, singing, cheering, and crying. Corbis  / Getty Images The Berlin Wall was eventually chipped away into smaller pieces (some the size of a coin and others in big slabs). The pieces have become collectibles and are stored in both homes and museums. There is also now a Berlin Wall Memorial at the site on Bernauer Strasse. Luis Davilla / Getty Images After the Berlin Wall came down, East and West Germany reunified into a single German state on October 3, 1990.